Digital asset lending relationships run on a master loan agreement plus a confirmation for each loan. We draft and negotiate crypto MLAs covering collateral, margin calls, rehypothecation and what happens to borrowed assets during forks and airdrops. Lending structures can raise licensing and securities questions that turn on the facts, and we flag them; pricing is a flat fee, quoted before we start.
At a glance
- Practice
- Crypto
- Pricing
- Flat fee, quoted before we start
- Included
- 6 deliverables
- Process
- 3 steps, one named attorney
- Where we work
- Slack, email or a call
When founders call us
The moments that usually bring a company to us for this work.
- 01
You are borrowing stablecoins or tokens from a lending desk and received its MLA
- 02
Your treasury wants to lend idle digital assets to a counterparty
- 03
You are setting up a lending product and need a master agreement for institutional borrowers
- 04
A counterparty wants to rehypothecate your collateral
What you get
Scoped in writing before we start. One flat fee for all of it.
- Master loan agreement and loan confirmation template
- Collateral, margin call and liquidation provisions with clear timing
- Rehypothecation and segregation terms
- Fork, airdrop and network event provisions
- Events of default, close-out and set-off mechanics
- Issues memo flagging lending licensing and insolvency questions as fact-dependent
How it works
- 1
Understand the lending
We confirm the assets, tenor, collateral type and which side you are on.
- 2
Mark up the MLA
We redline the counterparty's paper or draft your own master agreement.
- 3
Negotiate to signature
We work through comments and deliver a final MLA and confirmation form.
Mistakes we help you avoid
The ones we see most often, and catch before they cost you.
- Avoided
Agreeing to margin call cure periods too short to move collateral on-chain
- Avoided
Allowing unrestricted rehypothecation with no visibility into where collateral goes
- Avoided
Leaving forks and airdrops unaddressed, creating disputes over who owns the new assets
- Avoided
Ignoring how a counterparty's insolvency would treat your lent assets or collateral
Crypto Master Loan Agreement (MLA): questions founders ask
It is a framework agreement that sets the general terms for a series of digital asset loans between two parties. Each individual loan is then documented in a short confirmation with the asset, amount, rate and term. This avoids renegotiating the full agreement for every loan.
Rehypothecation lets the lender or borrower re-use collateral it receives, for example by lending it onward. It can lower costs but adds counterparty risk, because your assets may not be available when you need them back. The MLA should state clearly whether it is allowed and on what terms.
It depends on the agreement terms, the jurisdiction and how assets were held. Recent crypto lender bankruptcies showed that contract language about title and transfer can decide whether a customer is treated as an owner or an unsecured creditor. We draft with that risk in view, though outcomes are fact-dependent.
Some lending activity may require state lending licenses or raise securities-law questions, depending on who the borrowers and lenders are and how the product is offered. The answer is fact-dependent. We flag the issues in your structure and coordinate with your regulatory advisors.
Get a flat-fee quote for Crypto Master Loan Agreement (MLA).
A short call with an attorney. You leave with a written scope and one fixed price.
Book a call